AI coding tools have transformed from experimental sidekicks into core development infrastructure. Three global leaders : GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code (Anthropic) : now compete alongside three major Chinese AI coding assistants: Tongyi Lingma (Alibaba Cloud), CodeGeeX (Zhipu AI / Tsinghua University), and Baidu Comate.
This comparison is based on published pricing and feature sets as of May 2026.
Sources: github.com/features/copilot/plans, cursor.com/pricing, docs.github.com/en/copilot, claude.ai/pricing, tongyi.aliyun.com/lingma/pricing, codegeex.cn, cloud.baidu.com/doc/COMATE/s/rlnvnio4a
Pricing Comparison at a Glance
| Plan | GitHub Copilot | Cursor | Claude Code | Tongyi Lingma | CodeGeeX | Baidu Comate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free (50 premium requests/mo, 2,000 completions) | Hobby (limited Agent + Tab) | Free (chat only, no Claude Code) | Personal Basic: Free | Free (all core features, unlimited) | Personal Standard: Free |
| Entry Pro | Pro: $10/mo | Pro: $20/mo ($16/mo annual) | Pro: $20/mo ($17/mo annual) | Personal Pro: ¥59/mo (~$8/mo) limited time free | — (personal use is free) | Personal Pro: ¥100/mo (~$14/mo) |
| Mid tier | Pro+: $39/mo | Pro+: $60/mo | Max 5x: $100/mo | Enterprise Standard: ¥79/user/mo (~$11/mo, 10+ seats) | Enterprise: custom pricing | Enterprise Pro: ¥150/user/mo (~$21/mo) |
| High tier | — | Ultra: $200/mo | Max 20x: $200/mo | Enterprise Dedicated: ¥159/user/mo (~$22/mo, 100+ seats) | Private deployment: custom pricing | Enterprise Dedicated: ¥2,500/user/yr (~$35/mo, 100+ seats) |
| Teams | Business: $19/user/mo | Teams: $40/user/mo | Team Premium: $125/seat/mo | — | — | — |
| Enterprise | Enterprise: $39/user/mo | Custom | Custom | Enterprise Dedicated: ¥159/user/mo | Custom private deployment | Enterprise Dedicated: ¥2,500/user/yr |
| Student discount | Free for verified students | Free Pro for 1 year (.edu) | Claude for Open Source: 6 mo Max 20x | Free for all | Free for all | Free tier available |
| Usage billing | Usage-based AI Credits (since June 1, 2026) | Monthly credit pool per plan | Token budget resets every 5 hours | — | — | Agent request packs (pay-as-you-go) |
Source: GitHub Copilot plans | Cursor pricing sources | Tongyi Lingma pricing | CodeGeeX | Baidu Comate pricing
Key Pricing Takeaways
- GitHub Copilot Pro at $10/month is the cheapest entry for pro AI coding, but it now uses a usage-based billing model. You get 300 premium requests per month. Additional requests cost $0.04 each.
- Cursor Pro at $20/month is the most popular plan. It includes unlimited Tab completions and unlimited Auto mode. Credits only count when you manually pick a premium model on Max mode.
- Claude Code at $20/month gives you Pro access with a token budget that resets every 5 hours. Heavy users will need Max 5x ($100/mo) or Max 20x ($200/mo).
- Tongyi Lingma Personal Pro at ¥59/mo (~$8) is the cheapest paid plan across all tools. It's currently on a limited-time free promotion, making it effectively free for personal use right now.
- CodeGeeX is completely free for individual developers : all core features, unlimited usage, no subscription required. Enterprise private deployment is the only paid offering.
- Baidu Comate Personal Pro at ¥100/mo (~$14) sits between Copilot and Cursor in price. Its standout is the Zulu agent and Spec mode for spec-driven development.
- Business buyers: Copilot Business ($19/user/mo) is much cheaper than Cursor Teams ($40/user/mo) and Claude Team Premium ($125/seat/mo). Chinese tools offer competitive enterprise pricing starting at ¥79/user/mo (Tongyi Lingma).
- For cost-conscious developers: CodeGeeX (free) and Tongyi Lingma (free Personal Pro, limited time) are unbeatable value.
Model Access Comparison
| Model | Copilot Pro ($10) | Cursor Pro ($20) | Claude Code Pro ($20) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 mini | ✅ Unlimited | ✅ Included | ❌ |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | ✅ (premium request) | ✅ Included | ✅ Native |
| Claude Opus 4.7 | ✅ (Pro+) | ✅ (Max mode, credit cost) | ✅ (token budget) |
| Haiku 4.5 | ✅ Included | ✅ Included | ✅ Native |
| Gemini / Codex | ✅ (premium request) | ✅ (via API) | ❌ |
| Custom models | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Premium requests/mo | 300 ($0.04/addl) | Credit pool ($20 value) | Token budget (5h reset) |
Source: GitHub Copilot Pro+ | Cursor pricing detail
GitHub Copilot: Best for VS Code and JetBrains Users
Pricing: Free, Pro $10/mo, Pro+ $39/mo, Business $19/user/mo, Enterprise $39/user/mo
What it is: GitHub Copilot is the incumbent. It integrates directly into VS Code, JetBrains, and other major IDEs. In 2026, it goes far beyond code completions: Copilot Chat, Copilot Agent, Copilot Code Review, and Copilot CLI are all included.
Strengths:
- Lowest Pro price: $10/month is hard to beat. Free tier is generous enough for hobbyists.
- Deep GitHub integration: Copilot pulls context from your repos, issues, and PRs. The cloud agent can automate entire workflows.
- Multi-model access: On Pro, you get Claude Sonnet, GPT-5 mini, and Codex. On Pro+, full access to Opus.
- Code review built in: Automated PR reviews powered by AI. This alone saves teams hours per week.
- Copilot CLI: Natural language shell commands. Describe what you want in plain English.
Weaknesses:
- Usage-based billing: Since June 1, 2026, Copilot uses AI Credits. Heavy usage on premium models will cost extra.
- Pro+ at $39/mo: To unlock Claude Opus and 1,500 premium requests, you pay 4x the Pro price.
- Editor experience varies: Works best in VS Code. JetBrains and other IDEs lag behind in features.
Best for: Developers already in the GitHub ecosystem. The $10/mo Pro plan is the best value if your workflow stays within the premium-request allowance.
Source: github.com/features/copilot/plans
Cursor: Best AI-Native Code Editor
Pricing: Free (Hobby), Pro $20/mo ($16/mo annual), Pro+ $60/mo, Ultra $200/mo, Teams $40/user/mo
What it is: Cursor is a fork of VS Code rebuilt from the ground up for AI-assisted coding. Tab completions are near-instant, and the Agent mode can read your entire codebase, make multi-file edits, and run terminal commands autonomously.
Strengths:
- Best Tab completions in class: Cursor predicts your next edit with uncanny accuracy, delivering multi-line, context-aware suggestions.
- Agent mode: Cursor's agent can read your whole project, create files, run commands, and fix bugs autonomously. This is the most capable coding agent on the market today.
.cursorrules: Project-level instructions that shape every completion and agent behavior. This is a significant advantage for team consistency.- Generous free tier: Hobby gives you limited Agent mode without a credit card.
- Credit system that rarely hits you: Auto mode uses your local model effectively for free. Credits only deplete on premium models in Max mode.
Weaknesses:
- $20/mo entry: Pro is double Copilot Pro's price. For light users, Copilot delivers more value.
- Not a standalone product: It's a fork of VS Code. If your team is on JetBrains or another IDE, Cursor requires migration.
- Teams pricing is steep: $40/user/mo is more than double Copilot Business ($19/user/mo).
Best for: Developers who want the best possible AI coding experience and are willing to pay for it. The Agent mode alone justifies the $20/mo for professional developers.
Claude Code: Best for Agentic Workflows
Pricing: Free (chat only), Pro $20/mo, Max 5x $100/mo, Max 20x $200/mo, Team Premium $125/seat/mo
Claude Code is Anthropic's terminal-native coding agent. It's a CLI tool that runs in your terminal, reads your codebase, and executes complex multi-step development tasks.
Strengths:
- Best-in-class agent execution: Claude Code handles complex, multi-file refactoring better than any competitor. It writes the code changes, not just suggestions.
- Terminal-first workflow: No IDE dependency. Works with any editor (VS Code, Neovim, JetBrains) equally well.
- Opus reasoning: Claude Opus 4.7 is the smartest model for coding tasks that require deep logical reasoning.
- Context handling: Claude Code maintains coherence across very long contexts, making it ideal for large codebases.
- Open source maintainer program: 6 months of Max 20x free for qualifying projects.
Weaknesses:
- Agent-first, not editor-first: You interact through the terminal, not inline in your editor. Developers who want inline completions will prefer Cursor or Copilot.
- Token budget limits: Pro's budget resets every 5 hours. Heavy daily users hit this ceiling and must upgrade to Max plans ($100-200/mo).
- No free coding tier: The free Claude plan excludes Claude Code. You must pay at least $20/mo.
- Team pricing is expensive: Team Premium at $125/seat/mo is much more than competitors.
Best for: Developers doing complex refactoring, large codebase work, and agentic workflows. The tool for developers who need AI to execute complex work autonomously.
Tongyi Lingma: Best Value Chinese AI Coding Assistant
Pricing: Personal Basic Free, Personal Pro ¥59/mo (~$8/mo, limited-time free), Enterprise Standard ¥79/user/mo (10+ seats), Enterprise Dedicated ¥159/user/mo (100+ seats)
Tongyi Lingma (通义灵码) is Alibaba Cloud's AI coding assistant powered by the Tongyi Qwen LLM. It integrates with VS Code, JetBrains, and Visual Studio, offering real-time code completion, code generation from comments, unit test generation, and smart Q&A. A standout feature is its cross-file awareness : it understands context across files in your project for more accurate suggestions. The AI Programmer (Beta) mode supports multi-file batch modifications and test generation.
Strengths:
- Aggressively priced: Personal Pro at ¥59/mo (~$8) is the cheapest paid plan of any tool here, and it's currently free during the limited-time promotion.
- Solid feature parity: Code completion, chat, code review, unit test generation, code explanation, and comment generation are all included even on the free tier.
- AI Programmer (Beta): Multi-file editing agent that can batch-modify code and generate unit tests across your project.
- Enterprise features: Enterprise plans include knowledge base Q&A, VPC deployment, audit logging, and custom model inference.
- Chinese language support: Native Chinese comprehension for Q&A and documentation generation.
Weaknesses:
- No free Agent mode: The AI Programmer is limited to 50 conversation rounds and 50 test methods per month on the free plan.
- Less known outside China: The ecosystem and community are primarily Chinese-language.
- No standalone IDE: It's a plugin, not a forked editor like Cursor.
Best for: Chinese-speaking developers and teams using Alibaba Cloud infrastructure. The free Personal Pro promotion makes it perfect for budget-conscious developers who still want pro features. Enterprise teams get strong compliance features with VPC deployment and audit logging.
CodeGeeX: Best Free Chinese AI Coding Assistant
Pricing: Free for individual developers (all core features, unlimited usage), Enterprise private deployment (custom pricing)
CodeGeeX is developed by Zhipu AI in collaboration with Tsinghua University. It's built on the open-source CodeGeeX4-ALL-9B model with 128K context window, supporting 300+ programming languages across VS Code and JetBrains IDEs. CodeGeeX offers code generation, completion, translation between languages, smart Q&A, code commenting, and unit test generation. A unique feature is its Function Call capability with over 90% success rate, enabling the AI to call toolchains directly rather than just generating code.
Strengths:
- Completely free for individuals: No usage limits, no feature gating, no subscription needed. This is the most generous free tier of any AI coding assistant on the market.
- Open-source model: CodeGeeX4-ALL-9B is open source and can run on a single GPU (24GB minimum), enabling local deployment for privacy-sensitive projects.
- 128K context window: Handles large codebases and project-level context better than many competitors.
- Function Call capability: Over 90% success rate on function calls : AI can actually invoke APIs and toolchains, not just generate code snippets.
- Code translation: Translate code between 15+ programming languages, useful for migration projects.
Weaknesses:
- No Agent mode: CodeGeeX focuses on code completion, generation, and Q&A. It lacks the multi-file agent capabilities of Cursor or Claude Code.
- No enterprise tier on website: Enterprise pricing requires contacting sales. No published self-serve business plans.
- Smaller ecosystem: Fewer community extensions and third-party integrations compared to Copilot or Cursor.
Best for: Individual developers who want a powerful AI coding assistant without paying anything. Also great for teams that need open-source models for local/private deployment. Students and hobbyists get the most value here.
Baidu Comate: Best for Spec-Driven and Agentic Development
Pricing: Personal Standard Free, Personal Pro ¥100/user/mo ($14/mo), Enterprise Pro ¥150/user/mo ($21/mo), Enterprise Dedicated ¥2,500/user/yr (~$35/mo, 100+ seats)
Baidu Comate (文心快码, aka Wenxin Kuaijian) is Baidu's AI coding assistant powered by the ERNIE-Code model. It's the most feature-rich Chinese offering, supporting VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, Xcode, and Eclipse. Comate features code completion, Zulu Agent (end-to-end task execution), Spec mode (spec-driven development), Figma-to-code conversion, code review, MCP support, and a customizable Skills/Rules/Memory system. Its Comate AI IDE is a standalone editor built for AI-native development.
Strengths:
- Zulu Agent: End-to-end agent that autonomously plans, implements, and validates code from natural language requirements. Similar in capability to Cursor's Agent mode.
- Spec mode: Write specifications in natural language and Comate generates the implementation : unique among Chinese tools.
- Broad IDE support: Supports Xcode and Eclipse in addition to VS Code, JetBrains, and Visual Studio : the widest IDE coverage of any Chinese tool.
- MCP support: Compatible with the Model Context Protocol for extending agent capabilities.
- Comate AI IDE: A standalone AI-native IDE (similar to Cursor) with preview, element-level debugging, and Rule/Memory systems.
- Figma-to-code: Convert design mockups directly into code.
Weaknesses:
- Paid Personal Pro: ¥100/mo (~$14) is cheaper than Cursor ($20) but more than Tongyi Lingma's ¥59/mo. The free tier has limited agent capabilities.
- Agent usage is metered: Zulu agent consumes tokens from request packs. Power users may need to buy additional packs.
- Chinese-centric: Documentation and community primarily in Chinese. Less accessible for English-speaking developers.
Best for: Development teams using Baidu Cloud or needing broad IDE support (Xcode, Eclipse). The Spec mode is ideal for teams that want spec-driven development workflows. The Zulu agent competes directly with Cursor's Agent mode at a lower price point.
Source: Baidu Comate pricing | Baidu Comate features
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | Copilot Pro ($10) | Cursor Pro ($20) | Claude Code Pro ($20) | Tongyi Lingma (¥59/mo) | CodeGeeX (Free) | Baidu Comate (¥100/mo) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inline completions | ✅ Unlimited | ✅ Best in class | ❌ (terminal CLI) | ✅ Unlimited | ✅ Unlimited | ✅ Unlimited |
| Chat | ✅ In-editor | ✅ In-editor | ✅ Terminal-native | ✅ In-editor | ✅ In-editor | ✅ In-editor |
| Multi-file Agent | ✅ Copilot Agent | ✅ Agent mode | ✅ Best in class | ✅ AI Programmer (Beta) | ❌ | ✅ Zulu Agent |
| Code review | ✅ Built-in | ❌ (via extension) | ❌ | ✅ Built-in | ❌ | ✅ Built-in |
| CI/CD integration | ✅ GitHub Actions | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Terminal commands | ✅ Copilot CLI | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Native | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Project context | GitHub context | Full codebase index | Full codebase index | Cross-file awareness | 128K context window | Full codebase + Skills/Rules |
| IDE support | VS Code, JetBrains, etc. | VS Code fork | Any (CLI tool) | VS Code, JetBrains, VS | VS Code, JetBrains | VS Code, JetBrains, VS, Xcode, Eclipse |
| Model | GPT-5 mini, Sonnet, Opus | Claude, GPT, custom | Claude Opus/Sonnet | Tongyi Qwen | CodeGeeX4-ALL-9B | ERNIE-Code |
| Open source | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ Model open source | ❌ |
| Best for | GitHub ecosystem | AI-native editing | Complex agent tasks | Budget/value | Free + open source | Broad IDE + Agent |
Quick Decision Guide
| If you... | Choose | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| Use VS Code + GitHub daily | Copilot Pro | $10/mo |
| Want the fastest Tab completions | Cursor Pro | $20/mo |
| Need complex multi-file refactoring | Claude Code Pro | $20/mo |
| Want the cheapest paid plan | Tongyi Lingma Personal Pro | ¥59/mo (~$8) |
| Want a completely free tool | CodeGeeX | $0 |
| Need Xcode or Eclipse support | Baidu Comate | ¥100/mo (~$14) |
| Are on a tight budget | CodeGeeX or Copilot Free | $0 |
| Lead a dev team of 10+ | Copilot Business ($19) or Tongyi Lingma Enterprise (¥79) | $19/mo or ~$11/mo |
| Are a student | CodeGeeX or Tongyi Lingma (free) or Copilot Free | $0 |
| Want open-source/local deployment | CodeGeeX | $0 |
Summary
The AI coding tool market in 2026 offers six strong contenders across three global and three Chinese products:
- GitHub Copilot ($10/mo): The most affordable Western pro plan and best-integrated for VS Code + GitHub users. Usage-based billing is the catch: heavy usage on premium models adds up.
- Cursor ($20/mo): The best all-around AI coding experience. Superior Tab completions and Agent mode make it the top choice for professional developers who want the best tools.
- Claude Code ($20/mo): The best agentic workflow tool. Unmatched for complex tasks, but not a replacement for inline completions.
- Tongyi Lingma (¥59/mo): The cheapest paid plan overall, currently on limited-time free promotion. Strong enterprise features with VPC deployment and audit logging.
- CodeGeeX (Free): The only completely free AI coding assistant with no usage limits. Open-source model enables local deployment. Ideal for budget-constrained developers.
- Baidu Comate (¥100/mo): The most feature-rich Chinese tool with Zulu Agent, Spec mode, Figma-to-code, and the widest IDE support including Xcode and Eclipse.
For most professional developers, Cursor Pro at $20/month still offers the best balance of completions quality, agent capability, and predictable pricing. If budget is primary and you're deep in the GitHub ecosystem, Copilot Pro at $10/month is excellent value. For developers who want to pay nothing, CodeGeeX delivers solid code completion and generation at zero cost. Teams that need spec-driven development or broad IDE support should evaluate Baidu Comate.
Pricing sourced from official websites as of May 2026. Check each tool's pricing page for the most current rates. Copilot migrated to usage-based AI Credits billing on June 1, 2026. CNY to USD conversion uses approximate rate of ¥7.2 = $1.
Try Cursor Pro Free
AI-first code editor with unlimited Tab completions. Free for students with a .edu email.
Get Started — from $20/mo